Melo News | Friday, February 23, 2024 | Lusaka
The speaker has accused Mr Zulu of engaging in highly disruptive behavior and intentionally disregarding the instructions provided the previous day. This accusation came after Mr Zulu was observed wearing traditional attire from the Luapula region while in Parliament. The speaker emphasized that the dress code was well-known to the honorable member for Lumezi and that all members had been given clear guidance. Despite this, Mr Zulu chose to defy the order and guidance, leading the speaker to take the decision to name him for his actions.
During the naming, the speaker, referring to Mr Munir Zulu, expressed her view that his behavior was not only disorderly but also grossly so. She believed that simply sending him away for the remainder of the day’s sitting was not a sufficient consequence for his actions. In accordance with standing order 208, the speaker officially named Mr Zulu for his grossly disorderly behavior. This naming served as a formal recognition of his actions and the consequences that would follow.
In a separate development, Vice President Mutale Nalumango strongly criticized those who were threatening to remove the free education policy, labeling them as irresponsible and untrustworthy. She emphasized that free education was a crucial aspect that should not be tampered with, as it had brought hope to numerous vulnerable children. Vice President Nalumango’s comments were made in response to concerns raised by Kabwe central Member of Parliament, Chrizoster Phiri Halwindi, who expressed worry over leaders who were openly discussing the removal of the free education policy.
Vice President Nalumango found it both unbelievable and disheartening to hear leaders making such statements. She questioned the motives behind any leader in any country who would oppose free education, highlighting the negative consequences it would have on children’s lives. She emphasized that without access to education, children would be left on the streets, girls would be forced into early marriages, and boys would be susceptible to engaging in harmful activities. Vice President Nalumango firmly believed that free education had provided hope and opportunities for many, and she criticized those who wanted to maintain exclusivity in education for their own benefit. She concluded by stating that it was irresponsible for anyone to declare their opposition to free education.
